Search Results
The default setting for search results displays All Content. If you prefer to see recent content only, please adjust the date filter.
Filter your results:
Types
Topics
10 Results Found
Abbvie, Inc., et al, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Vs Murrill 340B Court Decision
The Court held a consolidated hearing on the various motions on June 6, 2024. After oral arguments, the Court took all the motions under advisement.
AHA, hospitals mandamus complaint to compel timely administrative review of Medicare claims denials
Plaintiffs the American Hospital Association (“AHA”), Baxter Regional Medical Center, Covenant Health, and Rutland Regional Medical Center (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this mandamus complaint to compel the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to meet the statutory deadlines for administrative review of denials of claims for Medicare reimbursement.
Legal Brief Re: 340B Contract Pharmacy Case - Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al – January 30, 2023
Drugmakers that participate in the 340B drug pricing program do not have to provide discounted 340B drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al.
Opinion Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Memorandum Opinion: Granting in Part, Denying In Part Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Decision by U.S. District Judge Billy Roy Wilson Regarding the Legality of the 340B Drug Pricing Nondiscrimination Act
Pending are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 24), Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), and Intervenors’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 35). The parties have responded and replied.1 For the reasons set out below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Intervenors’ cross-motion is GRANTED. Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s cross-motion is DENIED as MOOT.
AHA Asks Court to Order HHS to Promptly Repay 340B Hospitals For Past Unlawful Cuts
AHA urges the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to order the Department of Health and Human Services to promptly repay 340B hospitals for unlawful payment cuts in previous years, given the agency’s continued delay in implementing or even proposing a remedy on its own.
Judge Orders HHS to Immediately Halt Unlawful Reimbursement Cuts for Remainder of 2022
Judge orders HHS to immediately halt unlawful reimbursement cuts for remainder of 2022 re: 340B.
AHA's Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate the Unlawful Portion of the 2022 OPPS Rule Re: 340B
AHA files reply brief as district court considers 340B payment remedy for the remainder of 2022.
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Medicare Appeals Dashboard
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Medicare Appeals Dashboard
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Status Report and Dashboard
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA