Search Results
The default setting for search results displays All Content. If you prefer to see recent content only, please adjust the date filter.
Filter your results:
Types
Topics
117 Results Found
AHA, Hospital Associations Urge Appeals Court to Affirm Dismissal of FCA Claims Against Hospital
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals should affirm a district court’s decision to dismiss a meritless lawsuit that “sought to turn one doctor’s disappointment in not being hired by a hospital as an employed physician into an [False Claims Act] suit for Medicare fraud,” AHA and the four state hospital associations in the circuit said in this friend-of-the-court brief.
Amicus Brief: AHA, Others File Brief in Supreme Court False Claims Act Case
The U.S. Supreme Court should affirm the government’s authority to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit after declining to intervene in the case, the AHA, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Health Care Association.
Amicus Brief: AHA, AMA Brief Supports No Surprises Act Dispute Resolution Challenge
The AHA and American Medical Association friend-of-the-court brief in support of a Texas Medical Association lawsuit claiming the revised independent dispute resolution process for determining payment for out-of-network services under the No Surprises Act skews the arbitration results in commercial insurers’ favor in ways that violate the compromise Congress reached in the Act.
Amicus Brief: AHA, Hospital Groups Urge Appeals Courts to Uphold 340B Requirements Re: Novartis-United Therapeutics Corp. v. Johnson
The AHA, 340B Health, America’s Essential Hospitals, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Children’s Hospital Association yesterday urged the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 3rd and District of Columbia Circuits to require drug companies to fulfill their legal obligations to provide 340B discounted drugs to eligible hospitals and health systems, regardless of whether the drugs are dispensed on site or through contract pharmacies.
Judge Orders HHS to Immediately Halt Unlawful Reimbursement Cuts for Remainder of 2022
Judge orders HHS to immediately halt unlawful reimbursement cuts for remainder of 2022 re: 340B.
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Modify This Court’s Mandamus Order Re Medicare Appeals
AHA urges the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to deny the Department of Health and Human Services’ request to modify a court order requiring it to completely eliminate the remaining 19,802 Medicare appeals backlogged at the Administration Law Judge level. HHS now contends that it cannot fully comply with the order, stating that “it is unlikely that the backlog could be reduced completely to zero by the end of the fiscal year.”
Amicus Brief: AHA, AAMC in Support of the United States’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Re: US v the State of Idaho
The AHA and Association of American Medical Colleges amicus brief in support of the federal government’s motion for preliminary injunction for an Idaho law, which is slated to go into effect Aug. 25. At issue is whether the state law can coexist with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires hospitals to stabilize care for those in an emergency medical condition.
AHA's Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate the Unlawful Portion of the 2022 OPPS Rule Re: 340B
AHA files reply brief as district court considers 340B payment remedy for the remainder of 2022.
Terms of Use
By using the Services or visiting the Site, you, a User, acknowledge and agree that you have read, understand and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in these Terms and the AHA Privacy Policy. THESE TERMS FORM A LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND AHA. PLEASE READ THE TERMS CAREFULLY.
Amicus Brief: AHA, US Chamber of Commerce and AMC Re: Hospital Retirement Plan Case
AHA, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Association of American Medical Colleges in a friend-of-the-court brief asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center violated its fiduciary duties by selecting a retirement plan with excessive fees or poorly performing investments.