Search Results
The default setting for search results displays All Content. If you prefer to see recent content only, please adjust the date filter.
Filter your results:
Types
Topics
80 Results Found
Amicus Brief: Academic Medical Centers Support AHA in 340B Case September 10, 2021
In 1990, Congress enacted the Medicaid Rebate Program, as part of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. No. 101-508).20. This law requires drug companies that choose to participate in Medicaid to give states, which administer Medicaid, discounts comparable to those given to other payers.
Amicus Brief: Lousiana Hospital Association, Rural Hospital Coalition, Inc., AHA, 340B Health
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Amicus Brief: AHA 340B Health Arkansas Hospital Association in support of Arkansas’ 340B Drug Pricing Nondiscrimination Act
Amicus Brief: AHA 340B Health Arkansas Hospital Association in support of Arkansas’ 340B Drug Pricing Nondiscrimination Act against a challenge brought by PhRMA.
Litigation
This page contains materials related to AHA’s current and active policy-related litigation.
Legal Brief Re: 340B Contract Pharmacy Case - Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al – January 30, 2023
Drugmakers that participate in the 340B drug pricing program do not have to provide discounted 340B drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al.
Opinion Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Memorandum Opinion: Granting in Part, Denying In Part Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Decision by U.S. District Judge Billy Roy Wilson Regarding the Legality of the 340B Drug Pricing Nondiscrimination Act
Pending are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 24), Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), and Intervenors’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 35). The parties have responded and replied.1 For the reasons set out below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Intervenors’ cross-motion is GRANTED. Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s cross-motion is DENIED as MOOT.
AHA Asks Court to Order HHS to Promptly Repay 340B Hospitals For Past Unlawful Cuts
AHA urges the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to order the Department of Health and Human Services to promptly repay 340B hospitals for unlawful payment cuts in previous years, given the agency’s continued delay in implementing or even proposing a remedy on its own.
Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayment of 340b Drugs
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia should reject the Department of Health and Human Services’ request to devise on its own timeline a remedy for its 2018 and 2019 underpayments to 340B hospitals, with no limitations and no oversight by the court, AHA told the D.C. court today.
Judge Orders HHS to Immediately Halt Unlawful Reimbursement Cuts for Remainder of 2022
Judge orders HHS to immediately halt unlawful reimbursement cuts for remainder of 2022 re: 340B.