Search Results
The default setting for search results displays All Content. If you prefer to see recent content only, please adjust the date filter.
Filter your results:
Types
Topics
342 Results Found
Yale New Haven Order on Motion to Dismiss
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut yesterday largely dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Yale New Haven Hospital violated its fiduciary duties by selecting a retirement plan with excessive fees or poorly performing investments. The court allowed certain ancillary claims related to the plan’s recordkeeping fees to go forward.
Federal Court Dismisses Central Claims in Hospital Retirement Plan Case
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut yesterday largely dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Yale New Haven Hospital violated its fiduciary duties by selecting a retirement plan with excessive fees or poorly performing investments.
Amicus Brief: Optimum Graphics Inc, Vs Sutter Health
AHA filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to affirm a federal jury’s unanimous 2022 verdict in favor of Sutter Health and certain affiliates in a lawsuit that alleged the California-based integrated health care network violated federal antitrust law in their arrangements with health plans.
Legal Brief Re: 340B Contract Pharmacy Case - Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al – January 30, 2023
Drugmakers that participate in the 340B drug pricing program do not have to provide discounted 340B drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al.
Opinion Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Memorandum Opinion: Granting in Part, Denying In Part Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Decision by U.S. District Judge Billy Roy Wilson Regarding the Legality of the 340B Drug Pricing Nondiscrimination Act
Pending are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 24), Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), and Intervenors’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 35). The parties have responded and replied.1 For the reasons set out below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Intervenors’ cross-motion is GRANTED. Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s cross-motion is DENIED as MOOT.
AHA, Hospital Associations Urge Appeals Court to Affirm Dismissal of FCA Claims Against Hospital
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals should affirm a district court’s decision to dismiss a meritless lawsuit that “sought to turn one doctor’s disappointment in not being hired by a hospital as an employed physician into an [False Claims Act] suit for Medicare fraud,” AHA and the four state hospital associations in the circuit said in this friend-of-the-court brief.
AHA Asks Court to Order HHS to Promptly Repay 340B Hospitals For Past Unlawful Cuts
AHA urges the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to order the Department of Health and Human Services to promptly repay 340B hospitals for unlawful payment cuts in previous years, given the agency’s continued delay in implementing or even proposing a remedy on its own.
Amicus Brief: AHA, Others File Brief in Supreme Court False Claims Act Case
The U.S. Supreme Court should affirm the government’s authority to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit after declining to intervene in the case, the AHA, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Health Care Association.