Search Results
The default setting for search results displays All Content. If you prefer to see recent content only, please adjust the date filter.
Filter your results:
Types
Topics
342 Results Found
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Medicare Appeals Dashboard
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Medicare Appeals Dashboard
AHA v Becerra March 2022 Status Report and Dashboard
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Amicus Brief: AHA, Others File Amicus Brief in 7th Circuit Case on PREP Act Immunity
The AHA joins the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Medical Association in urging the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a district court decision that refused to allow a case involving the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 to proceed in federal court and sent it back to state court for further proceedings.
Live Analysis: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in CMS and OSHA Vaccine Mandate Cases January 7, 2022
Key Insights from the Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court in the CMS and OSHA Vaccine Mandate Cases.
Amicus Brief: AHA, Others in 2nd Circuit Case on PREP Act Immunity January 3, 2022
The AHA joined the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Medical Association in urging the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a district court decision that refused to allow a case involving the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 to proceed in federal court and sent it back to state court for further proceeding
Hospital and Physician Groups File Lawsuit Over No Surprises Act Final Rules That Jeopardize Patient Access to Care
Plaintiffs American Medical Association (“AMA”), American Hospital Association (“AHA”), Renown Health, UMass Memorial Health Care, Inc. (“UMass Memorial Health”), Stuart S. Squires, M.D., and Victor F. Kubit, M.D., by and through their attorneys, bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendants the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury, Office of Personnel Management, and the current heads of those agencies in their official capacities.
AHA, Associations, Hospitals Respond to Government in 340B Supreme Court Case
The government does not dispute that the agency singled out Section 340B hospitals as a group and set their reimbursement based on acquisition cost rather than price, without conducting the cost study that the statute requires. The agency’s action was therefore contrary to law.
Court Opinion in Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, and Novo Nordisk Challenges to 340B Contract Pharmacies Obligations
November 5, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Court Opinion in Novartis/United Therapeutics Challenges to 340B Contract Pharmacies Obligations (November 5, 2021)
This case concerns conditions that plaintiffs Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and
United Therapeutics Corporation have imposed on discounted drug purchases by certain safetynet
health care providers.
Court Order Novartis/United Therapeutics Challenges to 340B Contract Pharmacies Obligations (November 5, 2021
ORDERED that the plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 19 (Novartis), Dkt. 14 (United Therapeutics) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.